Estimation of Maximum Inclusion Size and Fatigue Limit in HSLA-100 Steel

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University

2 Department of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Hafez Ave, P.O. Box 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran


The objective of the current study is to determine the fatigue limit of a clean and high-performance material named as HSLA-100 steel and to compare the obtained fatigue limit with that of theoretically predicted fatigue limit by statistics of extreme value (SEV) method. Also, the size of inclusions located at the site of fatigue crack nucleation on the fracture surface of the fatigue test specimens is compared with the results of extreme value distribution of the inclusions as well as with that of analysis of inclusions found on the polished specimen. The fatigue cracks were initiated from globular inclusions in all fatigue test specimens. Analyzing the fatigue results showed that the SEV method can conservatively predict the planar fatigue limit of HSLA-100 steel. Also, the largest inclusion size predicted by (SEV) method was larger than that of what was observed at the fatigue crack initiation site as well as metallographic studies of polished specimens.


(1) D. Sichen, steel research international, 83 (2012) 825.
(2) S. Taniguchi, J.K. Brimacombe, ISIJ international, 34 (1994) 722.
(3) V. Gollapalli, M.V. Rao, P.S. Karamched, C.R. Borra, G.G. Roy, P. Srirangam, Ironmaking & Steelmaking, 46 (2019) 663.
(4) M. Imagumbai, T. Takeda, ISIJ international, 34 (1994) 574.
(5) ASTM E45:  Standard Test Methods for Determining the Inclusion Content of Steel, (2007).
(6) J. Ogilvy, Ultrasonics, 31 (1993) 219.
(7) Kato, S. Takemoto, K. Sato, Y. Nuri, Sanyo Tech Rep, 7 (2000) 35.
(8) Y. Murakami, S. Kodama, S. Konuma, International Journal of Fatigue, 11 (1989) 291.
(9) Y. Murakami, M. Endo, International journal of fatigue, 16 (1994) 163.
(10) G. Shi, H. Atkinson, C. Sellars, C. Anderson, Acta Materialia, 47 (1999) 1455.
(11) Y. Murakami, T. Toriyama, E. Coudert, Journal of testing and evaluation, 22 (1994) 318.
(12) ASTM E2283, Standard Practice for Extreme Value Analysis of Nonmetallic Inclusions in Steel and Other Microstructural Features, (2019).
(13) E.J. Czyryca, R.E. Link, R.J. Wong, D.A. Aylor, T.W. Montem, J.P. Gudas, Naval Engineers Journal, 102 (1990) 63.
(14) A. Abyazi, A. Ebrahimi, Materials Science and Technology, 32 (2016) 976.
(15) Y. Murakami, Metal fatigue: effects of small defects and nonmetallic inclusions, Academic Press, (2019) 321.
(16) A.D. Wilson, Inclusions and their influence on material behavior, ASM International, Chicago, (1989).
(17) H. Du, The evaluation of non-metallic inclusions in calcium-treated steel by using electrolytic extraction, thesis,
Stockholm, Sweden (2016).
(18) A. Costa e Silva, J. Mater. Res. Technol, 3 (2018) 283.
(19) S. Putatunda, A. Christ, E. Cabadas, M. Shapona, K. Tatteff, M. Rao, SAE transactions, (1994) 153.
(20) S. Beretta, Y. Murakami, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 32 (2001) 517.
(21) Y. Murakami, H. Matsunaga, A. Abyazi, Y. Fukushima, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 36 (2013) 836.
(22) C.C. Hsu, H.H. Chung, Advanced Materials Research, Trans Tech Publ, 939 (2014) 11.
(23) Y. Kanbe, A. Karasev, H. Todoroki, P.G. Jönsson, steel research international, 82 (2011) 322.
(24) P. Juvonen, Effects of non-metallic inclusions on fatigue properties of calcium treated steels, thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, (2004).
(25) A. Roiko, H. Hänninen, H. Vuorikari, International Journal of Fatigue, 41 (2012) 158.