International Journal of Iron & Steel Society of Iran

International Journal of Iron & Steel Society of Iran

Investigating of the effect of hardness, size and position of inclusions on the fatigue strength of the steel AISI 304

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Yazd University, University Blvd, Safayieh, Yazd, PO Box: 98195 – 741, Iran
2 Department of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Yazd University, University Blvd, Safayieh, Yazd, PO Box: 98195 – 741, Iran
Abstract
 One of the most crucial factors influencing the strength and quality of steels is the presence of non-metallic inclusions. Studies demonstrated that non-metallic inclusions in industrial parts diminish their fatigue strength. On the other hand, their hardness is another influential parameter affecting the fatigue strength of steels. Therefore, this research investigated the impact of non-metallic inclusions on the fatigue strength of AISI 304 steel with three hardness of 170, 250, and 330 Vickers. This research revealed that as the hardness decreases, the fatigue strength of the part also decreases. Additionally, an examination of the failure surfaces of the parts using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) indicates that non-metallic inclusions are the root cause of fatigue failure in the samples. Finally, employing Murakami relations, parameters such as stress intensity factor and critical inclusion size were determined for steel with hardness levels of 170, 250, and 330 Vickers. The critical inclusion size for steel with hardness levels of 170, 250, and 330 Vickers was calculated as 32.7, 24.8, and 15 micrometers, respectively. 
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Gao Y.K, Li X.B, Yang Q.X, Yao M, Influence of surface integrity on fatigue strength of 40CrNi2Si2MoVA steel, Materials Letters. 2007; 61(2): 466-469.
[2] Cong T, Qian G, Zhang G, Wu S, Pan X, Du L, Liu X, Effects of inclusion size and stress ratio on the veryhigh-cycle fatigue behavior of pearlitic steel. International Journal of Fatigue. 2021; 142: 105958.
[3] Ferro P, Fabrizi A, Berto F, Savio G, Meneghello R, Rosso S, Defects as a root cause of fatigue weakening of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg components, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2020; 108: 102611.
[4] Zhu X, Dong Z, Zhang Y, Cheng Z, Fatigue life prediction of machined specimens with the consideration of surface roughness, Materials. 2021; 14(18): 5420.
[5] Ye X.W, Su Y.H, Han J.P, A state-of-the-art review on fatigue life assessment of steel bridges, Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2014; 2014: 1-3.
[6] Zhang L, Thomas B.G, Inclusions in continuous casting of steel, InXXIV National Steelmaking Symposium, Morelia, Mich, Mexico. 2003; 26: 28.
[7] Wang Z, Xing Z, Wang H, Shan D, Huang Y, Xu Z, Xie F, The relationship between inclusions characteristic parameters and bending fatigue performance of 20Cr2Ni4A gear steel, International Journal of Fatigue. 2022; 155: 106594.
[8] Shimatani Y, Shiozawa K, Nakada T, Yoshimoto T, Effect of surface residual stress and inclusion size on fatigue failure mode of matrix HSS in very high cycle regime, Procedia engineering. 2010; 2(1): 873-882.
[9] Murakami Y, Endo M, Effects of defects, inclusions and inhomogeneities on fatigue strength. International journal of fatigue. 1994; 16(3): 163-182.
[10] Casagrande A, Cammarota G.P, Micele L, Relationship between fatigue limit and Vickers hardness in steels, Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2011; 528(9): 3468-3473. 
 [11] Lipa S, Sawicki J, Dybowski K, Pietrasik R, Januszewicz B, The effect of non-metallic inclusions formed as a result of deoxidation on the fatigue strength of 15CrNi6 and 16MnCr5 steel, Archives of Metallurgy and Materials. 2018: 1345-1350.
[12] Maleki E, Bagherifard S, Guagliano M, Correlation of residual stress, hardness and surface roughness with crack initiation and fatigue strength of surface treated additive manufactured AlSi10Mg: Experimental and machine learning approaches, Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2023; 24: 3265-3283.
[13] Lipiński T, Effect of Non-Metallic Inclusions on the Fatigue Strength Coefficient of High-Purity Constructional Steel Heated in Industrial Conditions. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(18): 9292.
[14] Murakami Y, Metal fatigue: effects of small defects and nonmetallic inclusions, Academic Press; 2019 Jun 15.
[15] Roiko A, Interaction of non-metallic inclusions, microstructure, and fatigue loading with small crack growth in high-strength steels.
[16] Murakami Y, Toriyama T, Coudert E.M, Instructions for a new method of inclusion rating and correlations with the fatigue limit. Journal of testing and evaluation. 1994; 22(4): 318-326.
[17] Saberifar S, Mashreghi A.R, Mosalaeepur M, Ghasemi S.S, The interaction between non-metallic inclusions and surface roughness in fatigue failure and their influence on fatigue strength, Materials & Design. 2012; 35: 720-724.
[18] Vasconcellos da Costa e Silva AL. Non-metallic inclusions in steels-origin and control. Journal of materials research and technology -JMR&T. 2018; 7(3): 283-299.
[19] Beretta S, Murakami Y, Largest-extreme-value distribution analysis of multiple inclusion types in determining steel cleanliness. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B. 2001; 32: 517-523.
[20] Wilson A.D, Inclusions and their influence on material behavior, ASM International, Chicago. 1989.
[21] Zhang J.M, Li S.X, Yang Z.G, Li G.Y, Hui W.J, Weng Y.Q, Influence of inclusion size on fatigue behavior of high strength steels in the gigacycle fatigue regime, International Journal of Fatigue. 2007; 29(4): 765-771.
[22] Yang Z.G, Zhang J.M, Li S.X, Li G.Y, Wang Q.Y, Hui W.J, Weng Y.Q, On the critical inclusion size of high strength steels under ultra-high cycle fatigue, Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2006; 427(1-2): 167-174.
[23] Saberifar S, Mashreghi A.R, A novel method for the prediction of critical inclusion size leading to fatigue failure, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2012; 43: 603-608.
[24] McGuire M.F, Stainless steels for design engineers, ASM International. 2008.